What makes us human? For ages, we’ve answered this by pointing to a “soul” that sets us apart and a sense of autonomy that lets us choose our path. The soul is often cast as a spark of essence, a mysterious core that makes life meaningful. Autonomy, meanwhile, suggests that we aren’t just cogs in a machine—we think, deliberate, and freely decide our actions. But as Artificial Intelligence grows more sophisticated—writing poems, composing music, solving problems—these old ideas face a test. What does it mean if machines can produce beauty and logic with no inner sense of self? How free are we if algorithms can predict and influence our decisions, sometimes more efficiently than we can ourselves?
This isn’t a story about machines “killing” the soul or dismissing human freedom. Instead, AI reveals how these concepts have always been less about hard facts and more about the stories we tell to understand ourselves. Think of it this way: The soul and autonomy are narratives we’ve woven through centuries, giving human life a sense of mystery, dignity, and moral weight. Now, AI is forcing us to hold those narratives up to the light and ask if we might need to rewrite them.
The Soul as a Story, Not a Thing
For many, the soul is the core of human identity, a non-physical spark that explains why we experience beauty, morality, and meaning. Traditionally, it set us apart from animals and machines. But AI complicates this view. When a computer can produce a stunning piece of music or a moving painting, it challenges the idea that creativity requires a soul at all. Machines can follow patterns and rules—no inner consciousness necessary—to produce outputs that feel rich, even if they arise from cold code.
Does this mean the soul is obsolete? Not necessarily. Instead, it suggests the soul might have always been more of a guiding symbol than a literal substance. It’s a narrative humans rely on to express hopes and values that aren’t easily reduced to physics or biology. The soul gives us a way to talk about the parts of human experience we struggle to measure—our deepest feelings, spiritual yearnings, and moral instincts. AI shines a spotlight on this storytelling function by showing that traits we once saw as “soulful” (creativity, complexity, pattern recognition) can appear in systems that lack any spark of self-awareness.
In some cultures, the idea of an irreducible soul has always been flexible. Certain Buddhist traditions, for example, highlight “no-self,” suggesting that clinging to a fixed essence can cause suffering. Other traditions emphasize relationships and community over any inner spirit. Instead of treating the soul as a rigid fact, they treat it as part of a larger story about how we find meaning in our connections and actions.
AI’s capabilities make this more apparent. We might choose to view the soul not as a fixed ingredient that explains human uniqueness, but as a narrative tool—one that inspires moral imagination and respect for human dignity. Even as machines produce incredible works without any subjective experience, the soul remains a valuable idea, guiding how we interpret the human condition in the face of mechanistic processes.
Autonomy Under the Microscope
If the soul is about what we are, autonomy is about what we can do. We like to think we’re free agents, making choices that reflect our moral values and rational thought. Yet both neuroscience and AI research show that decisions—even human ones—emerge from complex chains of cause and effect. We are influenced by genetics, upbringing, social pressures, and subconscious biases. AI’s predictive models highlight how predictable we can be. From targeted ads that seem to read our minds to recommendation engines that shape what we watch or buy, these systems hint that autonomy may be more constrained than we care to admit.
Does this mean we have no free will? Not necessarily. Rather, it suggests “free will” might also be a narrative—a way to interpret our experiences and hold ourselves and others accountable. Autonomy encourages responsibility. We tell ourselves we are free so that ethical discussions and moral judgments make sense. The idea of free will helps us justify praise, blame, and social norms.
AI doesn’t destroy this narrative, but it does pressure it. If a machine can outperform human reasoning in certain tasks, or if it can steer human behavior through subtle nudges, what’s left of our cherished sense of independence? Perhaps autonomy, like the soul, was never a simple fact but always a lens through which we view ourselves. The notion of free will may help us create laws, form relationships, and shape societies—regardless of whether we are “truly” free in some metaphysical sense.
In many cultural traditions, autonomy isn’t seen as an isolated power. Some Indigenous and Confucian philosophies emphasize the web of relationships that shape who we are and what we do. In these frameworks, freedom isn’t about standing apart from the world. It’s about acting ethically within it, knowing we’re influenced by countless forces. By shifting to this relational view, we can see ourselves and our AI tools as part of a shared moral landscape. Instead of worrying that machines might erode our freedom, we might recognize that freedom was never absolute—and that’s okay. It can still guide how we navigate responsibilities in a complex, interconnected environment.
Rethinking Our Narratives for the AI Age
Seeing the soul and autonomy as flexible narratives doesn’t strip them of meaning. It actually makes them more adaptable. In a world where AI can handle tasks that once seemed to require human brilliance, the soul can remind us that we crave meaning, purpose, and moral depth—even if those qualities aren’t “stored” in some invisible spirit. Similarly, autonomy can remind us to value moral responsibility and the importance of choice, even if our freedom is more complicated than we once believed.
These shifts can inform how we integrate AI into our lives. For instance, if we accept that creativity can arise without self-awareness, we might celebrate AI’s capabilities while maintaining a human perspective that seeks meaning, ethics, and empathy. In journalism, editors can use AI to produce rapid drafts but still rely on human judgment to ensure fairness, context, and sensitivity. In healthcare, AI can help diagnose diseases, but human doctors and caregivers can keep empathy and compassion at the center of patient care.
As we craft laws, policies, and cultural norms around AI, this new understanding can guide us toward balanced approaches. Instead of debating whether machines have “souls” or “free will,” we can focus on the role these narratives play in human life. We can use them as tools to remind ourselves of what matters: caring about others, accepting responsibility, and seeking understanding rather than certainty.
An Invitation to Reflect
AI isn’t just a technological achievement; it’s a mirror. By showing that intelligence and creativity can be simulated without inner life, it challenges us to rethink what the soul and autonomy really mean. Are they immutable truths, or guiding stories we’ve created to give life direction and depth?
Embracing these concepts as narratives rather than fixed facts can feel unsettling, but it’s also liberating. It invites us to adapt, to refine our understanding of ourselves, and to welcome new frameworks for meaning. As AI continues to evolve, we can use this moment to reflect more deeply on the human condition—recognizing that while AI may reshape our old stories, it can also inspire us to imagine better, more humane ones.
In that sense, the soul and autonomy remain alive and well. They are not destroyed by AI’s rise; they are transformed. We can see them as evolving tools for inquiry, moral consideration, and hope. By approaching them as adaptable concepts rather than rigid truths, we open the door to a richer conversation about what it means to be human in a world that now includes thinking machines.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Explore All Posts
Return to The Labyrinth of Thought